United States v. 2020-02-10 | 19-10162 | USA V. KISHOR CHAUDHARY | nonprecedential | memorandum disposition |

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

KISHOR CHAUDHARY,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19-10162

D.C. No. 5:17-cr-00136-LHK-1

MEMORANDUM
*

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Lucy H. Koh, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 4, 2020
**

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Kishor Chaudhary appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
his guilty-plea convictions and 12-month-and-one-day sentence for wire fraud, in
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344(1).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Chaudhary’s counsel has

*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED

FEB 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

2 19-10162
filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to
withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Chaudhary the opportunity to
file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief
has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.