United States v. 2020-01-10 | 19-10206 | USA V. EUGENE FULKS | nonprecedential | memorandum disposition |

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

EUGENE M. FULKS,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19-10206

D.C. No. 1:11-cr-00317-JMS-1

MEMORANDUM
*

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Hawaii
J. Michael Seabright, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 8, 2020
**

Before: CALLAHAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Eugene M. Fulks appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
the revocation of supervised release and the 15-month sentence imposed upon
revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Fulks’s counsel
has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to

*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED

JAN 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

2 19-10206
withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Fulks the opportunity to file a
pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has
been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.