United States of America v. Martin Omar Ramirez- Bustamante, a.k.a. Martin Omar Ramirez, a.k.a. Mario…

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MARTIN OMAR RAMIREZ-
BUSTAMANTE, a.k.a. Martin Omar
Ramirez, a.k.a. Mario Rodriguez-Vasquez,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 18-10273
D.C. No. 4:17-cr-00718-CKJ
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 17, 2019**
Before: McKEOWN, BYBEE, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Martin Omar Ramirez-Bustamante appeals from the district court’s
judgment and challenges his jury-trial conviction and 30-month sentence for
reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
APR 24 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 18-10273
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ramirez-Bustamante’s counsel has filed a brief
stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as
counsel of record. We have provided Ramirez-Bustamante the opportunity to file a
pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has
been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --