Jennafer Yellowhorse v. Kayenta Unified School District;

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JENNAFER YELLOWHORSE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
KAYENTA UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-15688
D.C. No. 3:16-cv-08093-DJH
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Diane J. Humetewa, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 15, 2017**
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Jennafer Yellowhorse appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing for failure to state a claim her action alleging various federal claims.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
NOV 20 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 17-15688
(9th Cir. 1998) (order). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Yellowhorse’s action because
Yellowhorse failed to allege facts sufficient to state any plausible claims. See
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (“[A] complaint must contain
sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible
on its face.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --