United States of America v. Marshall Charles Richmond, a.k.a. Marshall Charles Richmond, III

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MARSHALL CHARLES RICHMOND,
a.k.a. Marshall Charles Richmond, III,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-30071
D.C. No. 3:03-cr-00370-BR
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Oregon
Anna J. Brown, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 14, 2017**
Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
Marshall Charles Richmond appeals from the revocation of supervised
release and the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.
FILED
FEB 21 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Richmond’s counsel has filed a brief stating that
there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of
record. Richmond has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has
been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
16-30071 2

-- 2 of 2 --