DOMINGO CANSECO-RODRIGUEZ, AKA Domingo Conseco Rodriguez v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DOMINGO CANSECO-RODRIGUEZ,
AKA Domingo Conseco Rodriguez,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 15-71170
Agency No. A091-814-678
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 14, 2016**
Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Domingo Canseco-Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of
removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial
FILED
DEC 20 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

evidence the agency’s continuous physical presence determination.
Lopez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 847, 850-51 (9th Cir. 2004). We deny the
petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Canseco-
Rodriguez failed to provide sufficient testimonial and documentary evidence to
establish the requisite ten years of continuous physical presence in the United
States. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(A), (d)(1).
We reject Canseco-Rodriguez’s contention that the agency failed to analyze
all relevant evidence. See Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 990-91 (9th Cir.
2010) (holding the BIA adequately considered evidence and sufficiently
announced its decision).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
15-71170 2

-- 2 of 2 --