Ademola Ibuknoluwa Adesanya, pro se, AKA Ibuknol Adesanya v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General

14-71935Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit19.12.2016

Gesamter Gesetzestext

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ADEMOLA IBUKNOLUWA
ADESANYA, pro se, AKA Ibuknol
Adesanya,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 14-71935
Agency No. A029-237-836
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 14, 2016**
Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Ademola Ibuknoluwa Adesanya, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions
pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his
FILED
DEC 19 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

second motion to reopen deportation proceedings and his motion to reconsider.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.
Adesanya does not raise any challenge to the BIA’s dispositive
determinations that his February 10, 2014, motion to reopen was untimely and
number-barred, and that his motion to reconsider the BIA’s December 13, 2013,
order was untimely. See Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011) (a
petitioner waives an issue by failing to raise it in his opening brief). Accordingly,
we need not reach Adesanya’s remaining contentions regarding eligibility for relief
or his due process claim.
We deny Adesanya’s motions to take judicial notice and for summary
disposition (Docket Entry No. 16), and for an extension of time to comply with
future orders (Docket Entry Nos. 28 and 29). We deny his motion to file an
oversized brief (Docket Entry No. 24) as unnecessary. We deny his motions
regarding Nos. 15-16053 and 15-17064 (Docket Entry Nos. 25, 27, 28, 29 and 31)
as moot.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
14-71935 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.