Huazhong Xu v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General

13-71977Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit12.05.2016

Gesamter Gesetzestext

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HUAZHONG XU,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 13-71977
Agency No. A077-163-639
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 9, 2016**
San Francisco, California
Before: KLEINFELD, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Huazhong Xu petitions for review of the decision of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (BIA) vacating the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) grant of
protection under the Convention Against Torture and remanding for further
proceedings.
FILED
MAY 12 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

Under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), our review is limited to final orders of removal.
See Lopez-Ruiz v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 886, 887 (9th Cir. 2002). When, as here, “the
BIA remands to the IJ for any reason, no final order of removal exists until all
administrative proceedings have concluded.” Abdisalan v. Holder, 774 F.3d 517,
526 (9th Cir. 2014) (en banc). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over Xu’s petition
for review.
PETITION DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.