United States of America v. Alfredo Mendoza-Alvarez

14-30207Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit24.04.2015

Gesamter Gesetzestext

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ALFREDO MENDOZA-ALVAREZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 14-30207
D.C. No. 2:10-cr-02140-FVS
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Washington
Fred L. Van Sickle, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2015**
Before: GOODWIN, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Alfredo Mendoza-Alvarez appeals from the revocation of supervised release
and six-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Mendoza-Alvarez’s counsel has filed a brief
FILED
APR 24 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

stating that the appeal is moot, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of
record.
We agree that the appeal is moot because Mendoza-Alvarez has fully served
his custodial sentence and is not subject to an additional term of supervised release.
See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 14 (1998); United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d
1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999). We, therefore, dismiss the appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
14-30207 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.