United States of America v. Jorge Castillejo Hunosta, a.k.a. Mike Castillego, a.k.a. Jorge Huandsta Castillejo,…

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JORGE CASTILLEJO HUNOSTA, a.k.a.
Mike Castillego, a.k.a. Jorge Huandsta
Castillejo, a.k.a. Erik Caston, a.k.a. Saul
Matias,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 14-50146
D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00682-SVW
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 10, 2015**
Before: FARRIS, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Jorge Castillejo Hunosta appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 18-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
MAR 16 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 14-50146
Castillejo Hunosta contends that the district court erred by (1) failing to
address or consider his request that the revocation sentence run concurrently to the
sentence imposed for Castillejo Hunosta’s new criminal conviction, and (2) relying
on impermissible sentencing factors. We review for plain error, see United States
v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and find none. The
record reflects that the district court considered only proper sentencing factors, as
well as Castillejo Hunosta’s argument for a concurrent sentence, and sufficiently
explained the sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e); United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d
984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --