United States of America v. Luis Ensaldo-Flores

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LUIS ENSALDO-FLORES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Nos. 14-10074
14-10075
D.C. Nos. 4:12-cr-00355-RCC
4:13-cr-01178-RCC
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Raner C. Collins, Chief Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 21, 2015**
Before: CANBY, GOULD, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Luis Ensaldo-Flores appeals his guilty-plea
conviction and 37-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8
U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release and consecutive four-
month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
FILED
JAN 29 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

U.S. 738 (1967), Ensaldo-Flores’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no
grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have
provided Ensaldo-Flores the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No
pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on these direct appeals.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
14-10074 & 14-10075 2

-- 2 of 2 --