Parvinder Singh; Kawaljeet Kaur Sachdeva; Japneet Singh v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PARVINDER SINGH; KAWALJEET
KAUR SACHDEVA; JAPNEET
SINGH,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney
General,
Respondent.
No. 10-71489
Agency Nos. A099-873-204
A099-873-205
A099-873-206
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 8, 2014**
Seattle, Washington
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, RAWLINSON and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The BIA didn’t err in adopting the immigration judge’s adverse credibility
finding. The immigration judge listed “specific instances in the record that
FILED
APR 15 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

page 2
form[ed] the basis of the . . . adverse credibility determination,” Shrestha v.
Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1042 (9th Cir. 2010), including Singh’s voluntary return to
India, discrepancies between the affidavits of Singh and his father, and petitioners’
inconsistent testimony regarding their place of residence and visa application
process. Nothing in the record “compels a contrary conclusion.” Singh v.
Gonzales, 439 F.3d 1100, 1105 (9th Cir. 2006).
DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --