United States of America v. Manuel Cornejo-Rodriguez, a.k.a. MANUEL RODRIGUEZ- CORNEJO

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MANUEL CORNEJO-RODRIGUEZ,
a.k.a. MANUEL RODRIGUEZ-
CORNEJO,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 12-10665
D.C. No. 4:08-cr-00283-CKJ-
DTF-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 8, 2014 **
San Francisco, California
Before: BENAVIDES,*** TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
FILED
APR 10 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
*** The Honorable Fortunato P. Benavides, Senior Circuit Judge for the
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.

-- 1 of 2 --

Manuel Cornejo-Rodriguez (“Rodriguez”) appeals from the judgment
revoking his supervised release and the sentence imposed upon revocation.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rodriguez’s counsel has
filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw
as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro
se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80–81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district
court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --