Allen Woodyard v. Charles L. Ryan;

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALLEN WOODYARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES L. RYAN; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 13-15899
D.C. No. 2:13-cv-00342-SLG-JFM
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Sharon L. Gleason, District Judge, Presiding
November 18, 2013**
Before: SILVERMAN, BYBEE and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges.
Allen Woodyard appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for
preliminary injunctive relief against defendant prison officials. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.
FILED
NOV 27 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying
preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its
discretion. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008)
(listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press
Int’l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review).1
AFFIRMED.
1Appellant’s motion to expedite is denied as moot.
2

-- 2 of 2 --