Angel Balbuena v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANGEL BALBUENA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 11-71617
Agency No. A096-230-815
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 24, 2013**
Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Angel Balbuena, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration
judge’s denial of adjustment of status as a matter of discretion. Our jurisdiction is
governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.
FILED
OCT 01 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-71617 2
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary denial of
adjustment of status, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), and Balbuena does not raise a
colorable due process challenge to this discretionary determination, see 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(a)(2)(D); Bazua-Cota v. Gonzales, 466 F.3d 747, 748-49 (9th Cir. 2006).
In light of this disposition, we do not reach Balbuena’s remaining
contentions.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --