Ana Esther Morales-De Lozano v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANA ESTHER MORALES-DE
LOZANO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 11-72071
Agency No. A099-535-077
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 24, 2013**
Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Ana Esther Morales-De Lozano, a native and citizen of El Salvador,
petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her
appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence,
FILED
SEP 26 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-72071 2
Singh v. Holder, 656 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2011), and we deny the petition for
review.
Morales-De Lozano contends that extraordinary circumstances excused the
untimely filing of her asylum application. Even if she established extraordinary
circumstances, the record does not compel the conclusion that she filed her asylum
application within a reasonable period after the Department of Homeland Security
filed the Notice to Appear with the immigration court. See Husyev v. Mukasey,
528 F.3d 1172, 1181-82 (9th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, Morales-De Lozano’s
asylum claim fails.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --