United States of America v. Anthony D. Williams

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTHONY D. WILLIAMS,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 12-10148
D.C. No. 4:98-cr-01095-RCC
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 18, 2013**
Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Federal prisoner Anthony D. Williams appeals pro se from the district
court’s order denying his motion for clarification of his orally pronounced
sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
FILED
JUN 24 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

12-10148 2
Williams contends that the district court should have issued an order
clarifying that he was not sentenced as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1.
Because the record supports the district court’s conclusion that Williams was
sentenced as a career offender, the court did not err by denying his motion.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --