United States of America v. Francisco Gomez-Vasquez

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
FRANCISCO GOMEZ-VASQUEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 12-10390
D.C. No. 4:10-cr-01886-DCB
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 18, 2013**
Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Francisco Gomez-Vasquez appeals from the district court’s judgment
revoking supervised release and the 18-month sentence imposed upon revocation.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gomez-Vasquez’s counsel
has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to
FILED
JUN 21 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

12-10390 2
withdraw as counsel of record. Gomez-Vasquez has filed a pro se supplemental
brief. The government has filed a motion for summary affirmance.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. The government’s motion for
summary affirmance is denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --