United States of America v. Selso Randy Orona

12-10172Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit23.04.2013

Gesamter Gesetzestext

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SELSO RANDY ORONA,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 12-10172
D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00856-SRB
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 16, 2013**
Before: CANBY, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Selso Randy Orona appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges his jury-trial conviction and 180-month sentence for being a felon in
possession of ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Orona’s counsel has filed a
FILED
APR 23 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

12-10172 2
brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw
as counsel of record. Orona has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering
brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
Orona’s request for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.