Jiacong Chen v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JIACONG CHEN,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 10-72302
Agency No. A097-817-073
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 15, 2013**
Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Jiacong Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for an abuse of discretion
FILED
JAN 16 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-72302 2
the BIA’s denial of a motion to reconsider, Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964
(9th Cir. 2002), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Chen’s motion to reconsider
because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the BIA’s prior
order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --