Ingrid Urama Ramos-Perez v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
INGRID URAMA RAMOS-PEREZ,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 10-72209
Agency No. A070-803-444
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 13, 2012**
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Ingrid Urama Ramos-Perez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to
reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under
8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to
FILED
NOV 16 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-72209 2
reopen, Avagyan v. Holder, 646 F.3d 672, 674 (9th Cir. 2011), and we deny the
petition for review.
In her opening brief, Ramos-Perez fails to raise, and therefore has waived,
any challenge to the BIA’s dispositive determination that she failed to demonstrate
the due diligence required to obtain equitable tolling of the filing deadline for her
untimely motion to reopen. See Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 n.3 (9th Cir.
2011) (issues not raised in a petitioner’s opening brief are deemed waived).
In light of our disposition, we need not reach Ramos-Perez’s contentions
concerning her eligibility for asylum and related relief.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --