Teodora Rufino Torres v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TEODORA RUFINO TORRES,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 11-72184
Agency No. A074-819-783
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 9, 2012**
Before: RAWLINSON, MURGUIA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Teodora Rufino Torres, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal
from an immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to reopen. We have
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.
FILED
OCT 15 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-72184 2
In her opening brief, Rufino Torres fails to address, and therefore has
waived, any challenge to the BIA’s dispositive determination that her motion to
reopen was untimely. See Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011)
(a petitioner waives an issue by failing to raise it in the opening brief).
In light of our disposition, we need not reach Rufino Torres’ remaining
contentions.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --