Luis Arturo Parra Camacho, a.k.a. Luis Camacho Parra v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

08-74249Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit11.07.2012

Gesamter Gesetzestext

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Following the death of Judge Beezer, Judge Clifton was drawn to**
replace Judge Beezer on the panel.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LUIS ARTURO PARRA CAMACHO,
a.k.a. Luis Camacho Parra,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-74249
Agency No. A095-660-807
MEMORANDUM*
On Remand From The United States Supreme Court
Before: TALLMAN, CLIFTON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.**
Luis Arturo Parra Camacho petitions for review of the Board of Immigration
Appeals’ (“BIA”) order upholding an immigration judge’s denial of cancellation of
removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a). In our original decision, we relied on
Mercado-Zazueta v. Holder, 580 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2009), to hold that Parra
Camacho could impute his stepfather’s legal status to himself to meet the five-year
FILED
JUL 11 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-74249 2
lawful permanent residence requirement under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(1). We
therefore granted the petition for review. Camacho v. Holder, 412 F. App’x 32
(9th Cir. 2011) (unpublished). The Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated our
decision, and remanded for reconsideration in light of Holder v. Martinez
Gutierrez, 132 S. Ct. 2011, 2017 (2012). See Holder v. Camacho, — S. Ct. —,
2012 WL 1912199 (May 29, 2012).
Because Mercado-Zazueta is no longer valid precedent on the issue of
imputation under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b, see Sawyers v. Holder, — F.3d —, 2012 WL
2507513 (9th Cir. June 29, 2012) (per curiam), we now reject Parra Camacho’s
imputation argument concerning his stepfather’s lawful permanent residence.
As the parties do not dispute that Parra Camacho, on his own, lacks the
requisite lawful permanent residence, we uphold the BIA’s decision to deny
cancellation of removal.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.