Elsa Magali Torres v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ELSA MAGALI TORRES,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
Nos. 08-70600
09-71330
Agency No. A070-957-915
MEMORANDUM*
On Petitions for Review of Orders of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 26, 2012**
Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated petitions for review, Elsa Magali Torres, a native and
citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’
(“BIA”) orders denying her motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8
FILED
JUL 09 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-70600, 09-71330 2
U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to
reopen. See Ordonez v. INS, 345 F.3d 777, 782 (9th Cir. 2003). We dismiss the
petition for review in No. 08-70600, and we deny the petition for review in No. 09-
71330.
We dismiss as moot Torres’s petition for review of the BIA’s January 17,
2008, order because the order has been vacated by the BIA.
In its April 16, 2009, order, the BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying
Torres’s motion to reopen on the ground that she failed to show prima facie
eligibility for cancellation of removal. See id., at 785 (to establish prima facie
eligibility, petitioner must show that there is a reasonable likelihood that the
statutory requirements for relief have been satisfied).
In No. 08-70600: PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
In No. 09-71330: PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --