Jaspreet Singh v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JASPREET SINGH,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 10-71109
Agency No. A079-280-745
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 26, 2012**
Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
Jaspreet Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. We
have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the
FILED
JUL 06 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-71109 2
denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir.
2010). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh’s untimely motion to
reopen where the motion was filed over three and a half years after the agency’s
final order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Singh failed to establish changed
circumstances in India that were material to his claims such that he would qualify
for the regulatory exception to the time limitation. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii);
Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 987-90.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --