Angel Zuniga-Valencia v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANGEL ZUNIGA-VALENCIA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 10-73500
Agency No. A099-578-894
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 26, 2012**
Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
Angel Zuniga-Valencia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of his motion to reopen removal
proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of
FILED
JUN 29 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-73500 2
discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen, Garcia v. Holder, 621 F.3d 906,
912 (9th Cir. 2010), and we deny the petition for review.
Zuniga-Valencia submitted additional new evidence of hardship to his
United States citizen son, Angel Jr., to support his application for cancellation of
removal. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Zuniga-Valencia’s
motion to reopen on the ground that the new evidence of Angel Jr.’s anxiety and
mental health problems were insufficient to establish the requisite hardship, and
prima facie eligibility for cancellation of removal. See id. at 912-13.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --