United States of America v. Xavier Franklin, a.k.a. Zaybo

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
XAVIER FRANKLIN, a.k.a. Zaybo,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 10-50616
D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00559-VBF
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 17, 2012**
Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Xavier Franklin appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and
240-month sentence for distribution of cocaine base in the form of crack cocaine,
in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(iii). Pursuant to Anders v.
FILED
APR 25 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-50616 2
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Franklin’s counsel has filed a brief stating there
are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
We have provided Franklin the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No
pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Franklin waived his right to appeal his sentence with the exception of the
court’s calculation of his criminal history category and the imposition of conditions
of supervised release. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v.
Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to
Franklin’s conviction and indicates that the appeal waiver is operative.
Accordingly, we affirm Franklin’s conviction and dismiss the appeal of the
sentence in part. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.
2000). With regard to the court’s calculation of the criminal history category and
its imposition of conditions of supervised release, our independent review of the
record discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal, and we affirm.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
The conviction is AFFIRMED, and the appeal of the sentence is
DISMISSED in part and AFFIRMED in part.

-- 2 of 2 --