Tao Liu v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TAO LIU,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 10-73361
Agency No. A075-730-025
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 6, 2012**
Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Tao Liu, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”)
decision denying his motion to reopen and rescind his in absentia removal order.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion,
FILED
MAR 14 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-73361 2
Celis-Castellano v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 888, 890-91 (9th Cir. 2002), we grant and
remand the petition for review.
The IJ abused his discretion in denying Liu’s motion on the ground that Liu
“has not provided evidence to suggest” his immigration consultant attended Liu’s
asylum interview and immigration proceedings unbeknownst to Liu, where Liu
provides an outline of the events in his sworn affidavit. See Celis-Castellano, 298
F.3d at 892 (“[T]he Board must accept the facts in an alien’s affidavit as true
unless inherently unbelievable.”).
We grant the petition and remand.
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

-- 2 of 2 --