Amelia Reyes-Jimenez v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AMELIA REYES-JIMENEZ,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 09-74083
Agency No. A089-814-074
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 21, 2012**
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Amelia Reyes-Jimenez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions
for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing her appeal from an
immigration judge’s denial of her application for cancellation of removal. Our
jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.
FILED
FEB 29 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 09-74083
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that
Reyes-Jimenez failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to her
U.S. citizen children. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B); Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey,
552 F.3d 975, 979 (9th Cir. 2009).
Reyes-Jimenez’s contention that the agency failed to properly consider and
weigh all evidence of hardship under the proper legal standard does not raise a
colorable legal or due process claim. Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926,
930 (9th Cir. 2005).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --