United States of America v. Alejandro Rodriguez- Maldonado, a.k.a. Alejandro R. Maldonado, a.k.a. Alexandro R.…

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ-
MALDONADO, a.k.a. Alejandro R.
Maldonado, a.k.a. Alexandro R.
Maldonado, a.k.a. Felipe Olivera Mejia,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 11-10082
D.C. No. 2:10-cr-01361-DGC
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 21, 2012**
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Alejandro Rodriguez-Maldonado appeals from his guilty-plea conviction
and 21-month sentence for re-entry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
FILED
FEB 22 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-10082 2
§ 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rodriguez-
Maldonado’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along
with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant
with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental
brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We
dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d
1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --