Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-56079•John Fremont Steel, Iv v. City of San Diego;
10-56079Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit18.01.2012
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHN FREMONT STEEL, IV,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF SAN DIEGO; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 10-56079
D.C. No. 3:09-cv-01743-MMA-
WVG
MEMORANDUM*
JOHN FREMONT STEEL, IV,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF SAN DIEGO; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 10-56193
D.C. No. 3:09-cv-01743-MMA-
WVG
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Michael M. Anello, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted January 11, 2012
Pasadena, California
FILED
JAN 18 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-- 1 of 2 --
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, REINHARDT and W. FLETCHER, Circuit
Judges.
Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), a district court “may direct entry of a final
judgment as to one or more, but fewer than all, claims or parties only if the court
expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay.” Because the district court
did not make such a determination in the judgment before us, that judgment is not
final. See Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981). We therefore dismiss
these appeals for lack of jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.