Carlos Alfredo Lugo- Miramontes v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CARLOS ALFREDO LUGO-
MIRAMONTES,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-70443
Agency No. A077-195-285
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 19, 2011**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Carlos Alfredo Lugo-Miramontes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from
an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for adjustment of status
and waivers of inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v) and 1182(i). Our
FILED
DEC 30 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-70443 2
jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law.
Hamazaspyan v. Holder, 590 F.3d 744, 747 (9th Cir. 2009). We dismiss in part
and deny in part the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s decision to deny Lugo-
Miramontes’ applications for waivers of inadmissibility, which were denied for
failure to show extreme hardship to a qualifying relative, as well as his application
for adjustment of status, which was denied in the exercise of discretion. See 8
U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B).
Lugo-Miramontes’ contention that the agency erroneously relied on his
attempted fraudulent entry in 1998 to deny his applications for relief is not
supported by the record, and therefore does not amount to a colorable
constitutional claim.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

-- 2 of 2 --