United States of America v. Jeffrey Littlejohn

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JEFFREY LITTLEJOHN,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 09-50482
D.C. No. 2:98-cr-00947-WDK
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
William D. Keller, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 25, 2011**
Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Jeffrey Littlejohn appeals from the district court’s order granting his 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. Pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Littlejohn’s counsel has filed a brief stating there
are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
FILED
OCT 26 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

09-50482 2
We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental
brief. We have considered the issues raised by Garcia in his pro se supplemental
brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district
court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --