United States of America v. Haarun Abu Latif Munir, a.k.a. Cutty -, a.k.a. Sam -, a.k.a. Harry Truman Hicks

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HAARUN ABU LATIF MUNIR, a.k.a.
Cutty -, a.k.a. Sam -, a.k.a. Harry Truman
Hicks,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 10-30373
D.C. No. 4:10-cr-00064-SEH
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 27, 2011**
Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Haarun Abu Latif Munir appeals from the 300-month sentence imposed
following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess methamphetamine
with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. We have jurisdiction
FILED
OCT 3 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-30373 2
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Munir contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to
address his arguments regarding the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. He
also contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. The record reflects
that the district court did not procedurally err and, in light of the totality of the
circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, the sentence is
substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th
Cir. 2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --