United States of America v. Antonio Warren Gantt

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTONIO WARREN GANTT,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 10-10297
D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00148-PMP
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 27, 2011**
Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Antonio Warren Gantt appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and
188-month sentence for armed and assaultive bank robbery, in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
Gantt’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a
FILED
SEP 30 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-10297 2
motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the
opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or
answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s
judgment is AFFIRMED.
Gantt’s pro se motion to dismiss the appeal is denied as moot.

-- 2 of 2 --