Rukshana Hassan Mohammed Al-Amiri v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RUKSHANA HASSAN MOHAMMED
AL-AMIRI,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-71419
Agency No. A070-779-008
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted December 7, 2010
Pasadena, California
Before: PREGERSON, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Rukshana Hassan Mohammed Al-Amiri petitions for review of the denial of
her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the
Convention Against Torture. We deny the petition.
Substantial evidence supported the conclusions that petitioner failed to
establish her identity, nationality, or citizenship as required under 8 U.S.C.
FILED
JAN 27 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2
§ 1158(d)(5)(A)(i), and that she was not a credible witness. There was persuasive
evidence that Al-Amiri entered the United States in 1991, a year before she
claimed, as an Indian citizen with an Indian passport, contrary to her contention
that she entered as an Iranian national.
Al-Amiri’s confidentiality claim also fails. Under 8 C.F.R. § 208.6(a),
claimants are protected from “disclos[ure]” of any “[i]nformation contained in or
pertaining to any asylum application.” Nothing in the record indicates that it was
revealed that Al-Amiri had applied for asylum in this country. Showing the
photograph and verifying birth certificates did not disclose that fact or otherwise
violate the regulation.
We lack jurisdiction over any claim by Al-Amiri for CAT relief because she
did not exhaust the claim before the agency. Guo v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1194, 1199
n.1 (9th Cir. 2004) (citing Khourassany v. INS, 208 F.3d 1096, 1099 (9th Cir.
2000)).
PETITION DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --