Filiberto Rosas Carrillo v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FILIBERTO ROSAS CARRILLO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-74552
Agency No. A078-659-362
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 10, 2011**
Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Filiberto Rosas Carrillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion,
FILED
JAN 25 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-74552 2
Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005), we deny the
petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Carrillo’s motion to reopen,
because the BIA considered the evidence of hardship he submitted and acted
within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to
warrant reopening. See Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002) (The
BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or
contrary to law.”).
Carrillo’s remaining contentions are unavailing.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --