Maria Estrada-Delgado v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIA ESTRADA-DELGADO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-73167
Agency No. A079-799-963
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 10, 2011**
Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Maria Estrada-Delgado, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration
judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.
FILED
JAN 24 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-73167 2
Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243,
1246 (9th Cir. 2008) (per curiam), we deny the petition for review.
The IJ did not abuse his discretion in denying a continuance and entering a
removal order where Estrada-Delgado failed to demonstrate eligibility for benefits
under the Family Unity Program or submit any other relief application. See
Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d at 1247 (no abuse of discretion in denying a motion to
continue and ordering petitioner removed where relief was not immediately
available).
Estrada-Delgado’s remaining contentions are unavailing.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --