United States of America v. Ramon Lorenzo Medina-Cota, a.k.a. Ramon Medina-Cota

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RAMON LORENZO MEDINA-COTA,
a.k.a. Ramon Medina-Cota,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 08-10333 & 08-10334
D.C. Nos. 4:01-cr-01796-RCC
4:06-cr-01718-RCC
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 10, 2011**
Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Ramon Lorenzo Medina-Cota appeals from
his guilty-plea conviction and 75-month sentence for illegal re-entry after
deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and from his revocation of supervised
FILED
JAN 20 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-10333 & 08-10334 2
release and 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Medina-Cota’s counsel has filed a brief stating
there are no grounds for relief. We have provided the appellant with the
opportunity to file a supplemental brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, the district court’s judgments are AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --