Razmik Tahmazyan v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

06-74554Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit10.12.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge of the United States Court of***
International Trade, sitting by designation.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAZMIK TAHMAZYAN,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 06-74554
Agency No. A075-669-675
ORDER*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 5, 2010**
San Francisco, California
Before: HALL and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge.***
The Attorney General’s unopposed motion to remand this matter to the
Board of Immigration Appeals, so that it may reevaluate the Immigration Judge’s
FILED
DEC 10 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
adverse credibility finding in light of intervening case law, is GRANTED. See
Todorovic v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 621 F.3d 1318, 1325-26 (11th Cir. 2010); Razkane v.
Holder, 562 F.3d 1283, 1288 (10th Cir. 2009).
The removal order of December 20, 2004, is hereby STAYED pending
issuance of the Board’s decision upon reconsideration.
REMANDED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.