Rebecca Corpus Esteban v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
REBECCA CORPUS ESTEBAN,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-71141
Agency No. A019-703-413
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 19, 2010 **
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Rebecca Corpus Esteban, a native and the citizen of the Philippines,
petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her
appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for
cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review
FILED
OCT 25 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-71141 2
de novo claims of constitutional violations in immigration proceedings,
Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for
review.
The IJ did not violate Esteban’s due process rights where the proceedings
were not “so fundamentally unfair that [she] was prevented from reasonably
presenting [her] case.” Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir. 2000)
(citation omitted). Moreover, Esteban failed to demonstrate that additional
testimony may have affected the outcome of the proceedings. See id. (requiring
prejudice to prevail on a due process challenge).
Esteban’s remaining contentions are unavailing.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --