United States of America v. Ravee Suphunthuchat, etc.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not*
precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for
decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, Senior United States District***
Judge for the District of Nebraska, sitting by designation.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RAVEE SUPHUNTHUCHAT, etc.
Defendant-Appellent.
No. 09-50639
D. C. 2:09-cr-0267-JFW
MEMORANDUM *
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 5, 2010**
Pasadena, California
Before: FISHER and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and STROM, District Judge.***
FILED
OCT 18 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 3 --

-2-
After a bench trial, the district court found defendant guilty of access device
fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2). After the district court rejected
defendant’s motion for a new trial, defendant appealed to this Court arguing there
was insufficient evidence to support his conviction and that the district court erred
in denying his motion for a new trial.
When viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution,
“any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements” of access device
fraud beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Nevils, 598 F.3d 1158, 1161
(9th Cir. 2010) (en banc) (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979))
(internal quotation marks and emphasis omitted). The evidence viewed in the light
most favorable to the prosecution establishes that defendant opened a postal box at
a commercial mail receiving agency, received packages there containing items
worth thousands of dollars bought with three different J.P. Morgan Chase Bank
credit cards in July and August 2008, and gave some of these purchased items to
his daughter to sell on eBay. Further, payments were made toward these credit
card bills that were later returned unpaid for insufficient funds, consistent with a
“bust-out” scheme to commit credit card fraud.
A rational trier of fact could have found, based on this evidence, that
defendant (1) knowingly and with intent to defraud , (2) used “one or more

-- 2 of 3 --

-3-
unauthorized access devices during any one-year period,” (3) to obtain things of
value totaling at least $1,000 or more during that period, and (4) affected interstate
commerce with his conduct. 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2). Although defendant argues
there was evidence establishing he was employed by a man named Weerawat
Rahamadprasert (“W.R.”) and W.R. was the person engaged in the access device
fraud at issue, our job is simply to ask whether any rational trier of fact viewing the
evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution could have made a finding
of guilt. See Nevils, 598 F.3d at 1163-64. We are not to ask “whether a finder of
fact could have construed the evidence produced at trial to support acquittal.” Id.
In this case, sufficient evidence exists to support the district court’s verdict.
We further hold the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the
motion for new trial. United States v. Moses, 496 F.3d 984, 987 (9th Cir. 2007)
(standard of review).
AFFIRMED.

-- 3 of 3 --