Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
08-73071•Walter De Jesus Monterrosa- Cruz, a.k.a. Walter De Jesus Monterrosa v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
08-73071Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27.09.2010
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WALTER DE JESUS MONTERROSA-
CRUZ, a.k.a. Walter De Jesus Monterrosa,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-73071
Agency No. A037-222-334
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 13, 2010**
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Walter De Jesus Monterrosa-Cruz, a native and citizen of El Salvador,
petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily
affirming his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition for review and remand.
FILED
SEP 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
08-73071 2
The agency denied Monterrosa-Cruz’s request for relief under former
section 212(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) (repealed 1996), for failure to submit his
fingerprints by the deadline imposed by the IJ. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.47(c). The
agency, however, did not have the benefit of our intervening decision in Cui v.
Mukasey, 538 F.3d 1289 (9th Cir. 2008), which held that refusing to continue
proceedings for fingerprint processing may be an abuse of discretion. We remand
for the agency to reconsider its denial of Monterrosa-Cruz’s application in light of
Cui. See 538 F.3d at 1292-95; see also Karapetyan v. Mukasey, 543 F.3d 1118,
1129-32 (9th Cir. 2008).
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.