United States of America v. Alejandro Vanuelos-Fregoso, aka Francisco Javier Leon-Calderon

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ALEJANDRO VANUELOS-FREGOSO,
aka Francisco Javier Leon-Calderon,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 09-50329
D.C. No. 5:09-cr-00032-VAP
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 23, 2010**
Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Alejandro Vanuelos-Fregoso appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 30-
month sentence for illegal reentry by an alien following deportation, in violation of
8 U.S.C. § 1326.
FILED
SEP 07 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

09-50329 2
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Vanuelos-Fregoso’s
counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion
to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Vanuelos-Fregoso the
opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or
answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to Vanuelos-
Fregoso’s conviction. We dismiss the appeal of the sentence in light of the valid
appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).
In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062
(9th Cir. 2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it
delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to § 1326(b)(2). See United States
v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir. 2000) (remanding sua sponte to
delete the reference to § 1326(b)).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
The conviction is AFFIRMED, the appeal of the sentence is DISMISSED,
and the case is REMANDED with instructions to correct the judgment.

-- 2 of 2 --