Diana Bernardina Rodriguez v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DIANA BERNARDINA RODRIGUEZ,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-74739
Agency No. A070-944-043
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted August 23, 2010**
Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Diana Bernardina Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal.
We dismiss the petition for review.
FILED
SEP 07 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-74739 2
We lack jurisdiction to review Rodriguez’s collateral challenge to her
expedited removal order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(A) & (e)(2) (judicial review
of an expedited removal order is restricted to limited habeas review before the
district court); see also Avendano-Ramirez v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 813, 818-19 (9th
Cir. 2004) (collateral attack on expedited removal orders “severely” limited).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --