Salvador Santana Garnica v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SALVADOR SANTANA GARNICA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-70688
Agency No. A077-374-900
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted July 19, 2010**
Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Salvador Santana Garnica, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from
an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of
removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo
FILED
AUG 02 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-70688 2
questions of law, Altamirano v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 586, 591 (9th Cir. 2005), and
we deny the petition for review.
Santana Garnica’s contention that his conviction does not render him
ineligible for cancellation of removal because it occurred more than ten years prior
to his application is foreclosed by Flores Juarez v. Mukasey, 530 F.3d 1020, 1022
(9th Cir. 2008) (per curiam) (“[Section] 1229b(b)(1)(C) . . . does not place any
temporal limitation on when the crime was committed.”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --