Issam Mansour v. Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp.;

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Mansour’s
request for oral argument is denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ISSAM MANSOUR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE
CORP.; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 09-16778
D.C. No. 2:09-cv-00037-DGC
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 25, 2010**
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Issam Mansour appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his
action concerning foreclosure proceedings initiated by defendants. We have
FILED
JUN 17 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

09-16778 2
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Seinfeld v. Bartz, 322 F.3d 693, 696 (9th Cir.
2003), and we review for an abuse of discretion a denial of a motion to alter or
amend a judgment, Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5
F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993).
We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s orders entered on
April 21, 2009, and July 15, 2009.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --