Rolando Mendez Castillo v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROLANDO MENDEZ CASTILLO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-71227
Agency No. A070-781-777
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 25, 2010**
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Rolando Mendez Castillo, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying his motion to
reopen. We dismiss the petition for review.
FILED
JUN 11 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

07-71227 2
We lack jurisdiction to review Mendez Castillo’s claim that he did not
receive notice of his October 15, 1996, hearing because he has not yet raised that
claim before the immigration judge and thereby has failed to exhaust his
administrative remedies. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.
2004) (explaining that this court lacks jurisdiction to review contentions not raised
before the agency).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --