Jose Antonio Miranda- Navarete v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE ANTONIO MIRANDA-
NAVARETE,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-73743
Agency No. A094-199-512
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 25, 2010**
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Jose Antonio Miranda-Navarete, a native and citizen of El Salvador,
petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order
dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his
FILED
JUN 10 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-73743 2
application for a waiver of inadmissibility under § 212(h) of the Immigration and
Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h). We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s determination that Miranda-
Navarete failed to establish that denying him admission would result in extreme
hardship to his United States citizen mother and children. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h);
Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 888 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[A]n exceptional
and extremely unusual hardship determination is a subjective discretionary
judgment that has been carved out of our appellate jurisdiction.”) (internal
quotation marks omitted).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --