Kadhim H. Al Bumohammed v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KADHIM H. AL BUMOHAMMED,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-70873
Agency No. A071-674-058
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 25, 2010**
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Kadhim H. Al Bumohammed, a native and citizen of Iraq, petitions pro se
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from
an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen removal
proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.
FILED
JUN 02 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-70873 2
Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.
2002), we deny the petition for review.
The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Al Bumohammed’s
motion to reopen where he failed to establish exceptional circumstances, see
8 U.S.C. § 1229a(e)(1), and failed to establish that the denial of the motion to
reopen would lead to the “unconscionable result” of the removal of an individual
with an obviously valid claim for relief, cf. Singh, 295 F.3d at 1040.
Al Bumohammed’s remaining contentions are not persuasive.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --